Task Swarms Blur Roles

Sep 6, 2026

Part 2 of Industrializing Security Research .

---

Flagship Swarms Keep a Main Thread

The flagship implementations I checked use different mechanics but share one topology:

• Claude Code agent teams have a team lead that creates tasks, spawns teammates, and synthesizes their work. Teammates also load the project’s skills.
• Kimi Agent Swarm uses a commander to direct specialists.
• Gemini CLI subagents are specialists invoked as tools by the main agent.

The leader provides the main thread. It decides what happens next and assembles the result.

Part 1 explains why that topology fits coding better than security research . Research starts without a known destination, so dividing the work also shapes what each researcher looks for.

---

Every Redirect Rewrites the Specialist’s Context

In my early leader-and-researcher experiments, the leader did more than schedule work. It would:

• Pass hypotheses from one researcher to another.
• Redirect a researcher as results arrived.
• Add its own conclusions to the next prompt.
• Ask a specialist to cover a gap outside its original role.

Each instruction could help the immediate investigation. Across a long session, they made the assigned role negotiable.

A consensus hunter gradually became a general reviewer. A crash hunter inherited someone else’s framing. When the full skill suite was also available, either agent could switch techniques without a hard boundary.

---

Task Coordination Is Not Technique Isolation

These systems coordinate multiple agents. An industrial security-research process needs another property: the ability to repeat a specific technique without a coordinator quietly changing it.

I needed:

• A fixed research role.
• A bounded context.
• Only the techniques required for that role.
• An evidence standard shared across runs.

The model’s output can remain nondeterministic. The method should remain recognizable.

The breakthrough was to move the main thread out of a coordinating agent. Git could carry shared state without giving one growing conversation control over every researcher’s job.